We finished our last blog post by promising to take you on a digital tour of the major sources of radiocarbon data we have been scouring during our summer of data collection. So here we are, to start that tour-but it is going to be split up across three posts, simply because there are so many important sources (and important people) that we need the space to get them all in!
It might sound like the aim of Project Time, to collate all the existing radiocarbon measurements from Britain and Ireland within 3500-1500 cal BC, is quite a daunting task (it certainly did to us…). However, we are not the first project that has sought to collate radiocarbon data; this means there are a range of existing data sources for us to consult, which focus on particular areas, time periods, or types of archaeology. Perhaps even more useful, however, is the fact that these are open access sources, which means the data is freely available-so if you have a deep yearning to undertake a review of radiocarbon data, you can uses these sources too! So, here, in no particular order, are some of the most important datasets and datelists that we have been using:
‘The Archaeological site index to radiocarbon dates from Great Britain and Ireland’ is a huge dataset, containing over 15,000 radiocarbon measurements. Originally compiled by Cherry Lavell for the Council for British Archaeology, and added to by people including the Scientific Dating Team at Historic England (then English Heritage), it is hosted on the Archaeology Data Service website. Here, you can query the database for records based on a range of variables, including keywords, dates, or site types. Have a look for yourself here.
For Wales, there is the Wales and Borders Radiocarbon Database, which was created, and continues to be added to by Steve Burrow and Sian Williams, at the National Museum Wales (which can be found here) .
In Ireland, Robert Chapple has spent years collating his own set of radiocarbon dates, and has made this freely available to everyone here. This collection includes more than 10,000 radiocarbon measurements and we have been concentrating on the results that calibrate between 3500 and 1500 BC.
There are also a number of previous projects that have collected RC data and have made their datasets available to researchers. These can cover multiple time periods (such as the study by Bevan et al 2017 examining Holocene population fluctuations in Britain and Ireland), or they can focus on specific periods and practices, such as ‘Gathering Time’, ‘Cultivating Societies’and the ‘Beaker People Project’.
It’s really important to acknowledge that all of these sources are the result of a huge amount of work by those involved in these projects (and in our final publications, they will all be fully referenced). But perhaps more important is the fact that the data is made freely available – after all, archaeology should be for everyone, but to do that, we have to make our data accessible! So that’s it for now, but stay tuned for the next thrilling installment of our tour of radiocarbon sources, and as always, if you are part of an archaeological project, please get in touch on twitter (@projecttimearch) to let us know if you have data that you think we might have missed.
Things have been a little quiet here on the blog over the summer, but that is because we have been hard at work undertaking one of the largest things on our project ‘to do’ list: data collection. Although we are going to be submitting new samples for radiocarbon dating from a number of sites we are re-examining as part of the project (see our sites page), the majority of the radiocarbon measurements we will be using are what are known as ‘legacy data’. These are all of the radiocarbon measurements that have been generated by archaeological excavation and research in the eight decades since radiocarbon dating was developed and widely used. We are aiming to collate as many radiocarbon measurements that calibrate within the period 3500 to 1500 BC from sites in Ireland and Britain as possible. In particular, we are collecting a number of details about radiocarbon measurements-let’s take this measurement from Wyke Down 1 as an example:
Oak Charcoal, Heartwood
Here we can see there are a number of pieces of information we are interested in for each radiocarbon measurement:
The laboratory code for the radiocarbon determination (this allows us to refer to the specific preparation and measurement methods used by the laboratories)-for this example, ‘BM’ tells us this sample was submitted to the British Museum.
The uncalibrated radiocarbon measurement (in this case, 4140 BP, where BP stands for “Before Present” and where present is 1950 AD)
The error range of the measurement (in this case ± 80). We use the uncalibrated measurement and the error range to produce a ‘calibrated’ date – you can read more about calibration here on Oxford Radiocarbon Accelerator Unit’s website .
Quality control measurements , most notably the δ13C measurement (and we also collect the percentage collagen yield and C:N ratio for bone samples). These are important for assessing the accuracy and precision of radiocarbon measurement – you can read more about quality control measurements (also referred to as corrections for isotopic fractionation) on Beta Analytic’s website
Details about the sample submitted, including the material (such as charcoal, animal bone, human bone, carbonised residue), and more specific details (species, specific parts of trees, skeletal elements). In this case, we have the material (charcoal), the species (oak), and where from the tree the sample is from (heartwood). In this case, the fact that this sample is from oak heartwood is really important, because the measurement obtained from this sample identifies the year that the specific tree ring grew (as opposed to the moment the tree was cut down). Given that Oak can live for hundreds of years, this measurement may, therefore, overestimate the age of this deposit-hence why it is so important we collect these details!
One final, but vital piece of information we need to collect is the archaeological context – where did the sample come from, how did it get there (ie, what type of deposit), and how do radiocarbon measurements from a site relate to each other. This information allows us to think about how multiple measurements from a site relate to each other, and can inform on the sequence of events at a site. The combination of these measurements and our ‘prior beliefs’ – the archaeological relationships between the contexts from which the measurements come from – is a core component of Bayesian statistical modelling, which we will be using to model our dates once our data collection has finished (more on Bayesian modelling in future posts!).
So, “where have we been getting all of this data from?” I hear you ask. Well, most of this work is desk-based and in the next few blog posts, we will be taking you on a tour of some of the most important sources of radiocarbon data we have been looking at, many of which are freely available to all of us! So join us next time for a radiocarbon data adventure, and in the meantime, if you are part of an archaeological project, please get in touch on twitter ( @projecttimearch ) to let us know if you have data that you think we might have missed.
Hello, I’m Penny and I work as a researcher with Project TIME. I am an archaeobotanist, so I look at plant macro-remains (usually charred fruits and seeds) that are preserved in archaeological deposits. These are good raw materials for radiocarbon dates from excavated sites.
I’m really excited about starting Project TIME’s database, it’s a great opportunity for me to also research lots of archaeobotanical results from the period between 3500 and 2000 BC. I’m particularly interested in looking at contexts where apple remains are found. Crab apples are native trees in Britain and Ireland and their fruit was probably utilised by people from the earliest times. However, several archaeobotanists have noticed that their remains seem more frequent in the period covered by Project TIME, particularly from approximately 3400 BC onwards (for example, see Whitehouse et al. 2014).
So, we’re off! After seemingly months where recruitment of the team has stalled due to the pandemic, and Seren changing jobs and arriving at the wonderful Manchester Metropolitan University (hurrah!), we are finally ready to get going… But, managing a research project that needs a lot of access to museum archives during the time of a global pandemic is not as easy as you might think. Lots of the archives that we hope to visit are currently closed and not accepting research visits, and some of the museums have closed their doors entirely, possibly forever. Throw into the mix an international research project at a time when international travel is not really possible, and we have had to significantly change how we are working on the project. This said, we can still get access to some archives, under very limited conditions. Because of this we are focusing on sites that we can get access to collections and details of the material culture. First up on our list are the sites located around Wyke Down, a really significant series of places for our time period, excavate by a number of researchers including the fabulous Martin Green, whom we hope to interview soon in our podcast series. Given all the difficulties of research work at the moment, we can’t tell you the thrill of receiving in the post an unpublished student thesis with details of the faunal remains from one of the sites. Or the excitement of the team when we start to think about actual sample selection for 14C measurement from the — did we mention this? — *really stonking* series of sites excavated by Martin and his colleagues. This is what makes archives work in archaeology so exciting, being able to revisit colleagues’ work with new techniques! We can’t wait to share some more of the research process and the results as we go.